Advanced therapy planning in hepatic surgery
By Dirk Wetzel, medical doctor/engineer at MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU-Munich
The planning of hepatic surgery of primary and secondary liver tumours is a multimodal process, using modern imaging techniques - mainly contrast enhanced imaging such as CAT and MRI - depending on the patient’s individual situation as well as on the experience of the medical personnel who are planning the therapy.

Dirk Wetzel
The Somatom Sensation 16 multislice scanner (Siemens Medical solutions, Erlangen) provides highly defined abdominal images, showing the liver, vessel structures and the individual lesion. It was found that the optimal ratio between signal and noise is achieved with a slice thickness of 2 mm for venous contrasted images, and 1 mm for arterial contrasted images. After anonymisation, images are transferred, by a high-speed internet connection, to MeVis for image processing and the creation of a virtual 3D model of the individual patient’s liver anatomy. The software has two components: HepaVision and InterventionPlanner.

Fig.1: 3D and 2D display of the portal vein, liver segments, tumours and area at risk

Fig.2: Resection planning: volumetric information
InterventionPlanner, the second software module, utilises the segmented data to provide interactive generation of resection proposals, with arbitrary safety margins around the tumours and user-defined cutting lines. The volume of remaining liver parenchyma is calculated separately for each resection proposal. (Fig. 2).
The process of oncological liver resection planning is in clinical use at our institution. Virtual resection planning provided valuable information particularly for surgical decision-making in cases of more than one liver metastasis, or of tumours located close to the liver hilus. Precise calculation of the liver volume remaining after different surgical scenarios provides a perspective of potentially curable surgical interventions for an increasing number of patients.
A study of virtual surgical planning vs. the conventional approach is currently underway.
* Researchers: D Wetzel, U Stangl, H Feussner at MITI (www.miti.med.tum.de), and A Schenk and H O Peitgen at MeVis Centre for Medical Diagnostic Systems and Visualisation, Bremen (www.mevis.de)
This article was published on 04/30/2003






